美国国际贸易法院拒绝中国河北兴茂轮胎有限公司就非公路用轮胎 “反倾销和反补贴”发布临时限制令案评析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

复旦大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

DF961

基金项目:


Comment on:US Interna tional Trade Court Denied the Motion of He bei Starbright Tire Co. for Temporary Restra ining Order and a Pre liminary Injunction in the New Pne umatic Of -The-Road Tires Antidumping and Counte rva iling Case
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    中国河北兴茂轮胎有限公司出口至美国的某些非公路用轮胎在美国被指控构成倾销和补贴。美国商务部、美国国际贸易委员会分别做出了倾销及补贴存在、损害成立的裁定。中国河北兴茂轮胎有限公司联合美国进口商向美国国际贸易法院提出发布临时禁令的动议,但美国国际贸易法院给予了否定。本文对本案的基本案情做了梳理,归纳了美国法院的判决思路,最后将本案涉及的美国相关程序制度上的临时禁止令进行了分析,并指出了美国法院可能存在的判决推理错误。本案对中国企业今后积极抗衡美国的反倾销和反补贴指控,有一定的借鉴意义。

    Abstract:

    The certain off-the-road tires exported to the United States by Hebei Starbright Tire Co. of China are accused of dumping and subsidies. The US Commerce and the International Trade Commission respectively made their final AD and CVD determinations, as well as the affirmative iniury determination. Hebei Starbright Tire Co. of China, associated with their importer in the US, filed a motion for temporary iniunctions with the US Court of International Trade. However,the motion was denied by th e court. In this es s ay , we will introduce the bas ic background inform ation of this cas e, summarize the reasoning of the court on the iudgment, and finally, analyze the temporary restraining order in the American procedural rules referred in this case. Meanwhile, the possible mistakes made in the reasoning and ruling of the court would be pointed out.This case is a quotable experience for the Chinese enterprises to positively deal with the accusation of antidumping and counter vailing by the US in the f uture .

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

龚柏华,张旎.美国国际贸易法院拒绝中国河北兴茂轮胎有限公司就非公路用轮胎 “反倾销和反补贴”发布临时限制令案评析[J].国际商务研究,2009,(2):31-36

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭