After default judgment was entered against People's Republicof China(PRC)inparent'sprod ucts liability action for death of their son due to allegedly defective semi-automatic rifle，parents served restraining notices and subpoenas on New York branches of Chinese banks to forbid sale or transfer PRC assets. Banks filed motion to vacate the restraining orders and quash the subpoenas. The District Court， Sidney H. Stein，J.， held that assets were located outside the United States. The FSLA provides noexcep tion to the PRC's sovereign immunity that would justify that procedure.This article comments on the defence arguments for Chinese government on its sovereign immunity，the advantages or disadvantage for the Chinese state-owned company to claim the sovereig nimmunity，the execution of a defaultjudgment on the Chinese government to the property of the Chinese state-owed company.