Abstract:“China-Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials Case”is another China’s lostcase following the losing of“China and US Tyres Case.”China is charged for violating relevant obligations ofChina’s Accession Protocol and the GATT by imposing export restrictions on nine kinds of raw materials. WhileChina invokes Article XX (b) and (g) of the GATT 1994 for reasons that export restrictions imposed on the rawmaterials is for the purpose of protecting human, animal or plant life or health; or protecting environment andexhaustible natural resources. It’s a pity that the decision of this case is of no benefit to China because the paneluses mechanical and strict interpretations in relevant articles. However, China lacks proof and its legal documentsand domestic relevant legislations and policies have many problems which need to be summed up and counterconsidered.In that case, China can effectively respond to the future litigation under the WTO.