“一带一路”倡议下我国仲裁员制度的创新研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1.华东政法大学,上海 200042;2.上海财经大学,上海 200433)

作者简介:

郇恒娟,华东政法大学国际法学院博士研究生,研究方向:国际商法理论;张圣翠,上海财经大学法学院教授,研究方向:国际商法理论。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

DF982

基金项目:

上海市哲学社会科学基金项目“国际仲裁上诉机制研究”(项目编号:2017BFX012)。


A Study of Innovative Legal System for Arbitrators in China under the Belt and Road Initiative
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    仲裁是我国与“一带一路”倡议下各国家与地区之间解决民商事争议的重要手段之一,但我国的仲裁制度却十分缺乏竞争力,其中最为关键的仲裁员制度更有较大缺陷,予以完善十分必要与迫切。除特殊列举的少量类型人员外,“一带一路”倡议下我国仲裁员制度的创新具体应包括允许一般的行为能力者具有仲裁员的资格、当事人可自主地决定组建仲裁庭的仲裁员人数、仲裁员中立性争议应有及时的司法救济权、发挥当事人所选仲裁员在选定首席仲裁员过程中的作用、提供任意性的司法任命临时仲裁员的规则并对后者施加合理的法律责任等。

    Abstract:

    Arbitration is one of the most important means to resolve civil and commercial disputes between Mainland China and those jurisdictions under the Belt and Road Initiative. However, the arbitration system of Mainland China is relatively uncompetitive, and the most critical legal rules concerning arbitrators have more defects. Therefore, it is very necessary and urgent to have innovative lawmaking concerning arbitrators, which should include that average persons with legal capacity can normally be selected as arbitrators, that the parties have the right to determine the number of each arbitral tribunal, that co-abitrators can select the chairman of each arbitral tribunal unless agreed otherwise by the parties, that there exist default rules for the courts to appoint arbitrators when no effective mechanism between the parties takes place, that mandatory rules are established for arbitrators to be neutral, that adequate liability provisions for arbitrators are created.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郇恒娟,张圣翠.“一带一路”倡议下我国仲裁员制度的创新研究[J].国际商务研究,2019,(3):79-87

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-05-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭