增加值贸易视角下中国比较优势动态演变研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京 100081)

作者简介:

史巧玲,北京理工大学管理与经济学院博士生,研究方向:国际贸易与气候变化;赵玉焕(通讯作者),北京理工大学管理与经济学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:国际贸易与气候变化、能源与气候经济学。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F752.6

基金项目:

北京市自然科学基金面上项目“北京市居民消费结构变动对碳排放的影响研究”(项目编号:9172015);北


Study on the Dynamic Evolution of China’s Comparative Advantage from the Perspective of Trade in Value Added
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用 WIOD数据库及 KWW分解框架对 1995~2011年中国总出口额进行分解,得到35个部门出口增加值。在此基础上,从两种统计方式对比角度,测算分析了中国总体及不同行业的增加值比较优势(VRCA)与贸易总额比较优势(TRCA),同时与美国进行对比。研究结果表明,在增加值贸易统计方式下,中国总体对外贸易表现为比较劣势,制造业部门 VRCA较为明显但长期呈下降趋势,服务业 VRCA呈上升趋势,1995~2011年间部分部门的比较优势出现逆转。相对于 VRCA,TRCA对中国总体对外贸易真实比较优势高估了约12.94%,制造业部门的比较优势高估程度更大;从行业分类来看,中国低技术制造业及劳动密集型服务业的比较优势更为显著。从中美对比来看,美国总体 VRCA与中国水平相当,但其优势部门集中于中高技术制造业与知识密集型服务业;总额统计方式低估了美国总体尤其是服务业部门的真实比较优势。

    Abstract:

    Using the WIOD database and the KWW decomposition framework, this study calculates value added exports of 35 sectors in China from 1995 to 2011, and accordingly to get the VRCA. We also calculate the TRCA to trace the differences and dynamic characteristics of China’s comparative advantage under two statistical methods. To explore the differences between industries, this paper classifies manufacture and service industries according to their technology and factor endowments respectively. Besides, we select the United States as a reference. According to the results, China has a comparative disadvantage in the overall industry under the value added trade statistics. The manufacturing industry have significant comparative advantages but with a declining trend, and the comparative advantage of service industry is on the rise. Some sectors have a reversion in its comparative advantage. Compared with VRCA, TRCA obviously overestimated the true comparative advantage of China’s overall industry approximately to 12.94%. This overestimation is much larger in manufacturing sectors due to the prevalence of processing trade. From the industrial classification perspective, the advantage of low-tech manufacturing and labor-intensive service sectors in China is much higher in benefit of the “demographic dividend”. Compared with China, the main advantage sectors in the United States are concentrated in the service sectors though its overall VRCA level is close to China under the value-added trade statistics. The comparative advantages of medium-hightech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive service industries are more significant in the United States relying on its advance science and technologies. The TRCA underestimated the real comparative advantage of the United States, particularly in service sectors.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

史巧玲,赵玉焕.增加值贸易视角下中国比较优势动态演变研究[J].国际商务研究,2020,(2):16-30

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-03-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭