In recent years, the US and EU trade remedy measures frequently inculpate with third countries. EU’s CVD investigations regard financial contributions of home countries to their investors as actions of host countries. the US antidumping investigations consider underpriced raw materials from third countries a contribution to Particular Market Situation and de facto impose upon the countries under investigation the obligation to maintain a perfect competing market. This directly goes against the determination of“government”under current CVD rules and contradicts anti-dumping rules concerning“proper comparison”. This is because during the evolution from industrial chain to value chains, both the US and EU find current trade rules unsatisfactory for their national interests. They also lack the capacity to impose new rules. China ought to clarify the components for state responsibility so that it would not impede China’s sovereignty or the Belt and Road Initiative. Moreover, while it is advisable to emphasize upon the Proper Comparison rule, time is not yet ripe for China to lead the draft of new rules.