上海合作组织投资便利化的法律问题
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(大连海事大学,辽宁 大连 116026)

作者简介:

王淑敏,大连海事大学法学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向:国际经济法;张乐,大连海事大学法学院博士研究生,研究方向:国际投资法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F741.2

基金项目:

辽宁省哲学社会科学规划基金项目“辽宁自贸区多元化争议解决机制运用区块链的问题研究”(项目编号:L20AFX005)。


The Legal Issues of Investment Facilitation of Shanghai Cooperation Organization
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《上海合作组织成立宣言》明确提出开启投资便利化谈判议程,之后成员国多次在元首宣言中强调了这一主题,《上海合作组织宪章》从组织法角度推动投资便利化进程,签署备忘录和议定书作为软法共同促进投资便利化。目前国际社会尚未形成统一的投资便利化定义,上海合作组织把投资便利化定义为成员国采取的一系列旨在吸引外国投资,并在投资周期的全部阶段使其管理有效性和效率达到最大化,保障透明度、程序简化和可预测性的所有行动或做法,以及满足上海合作组织自贸区一体化的上述措施。负面清单不透明成为上海合作组织成员国投资准入阶段便利化最为突出的障碍,国际投资“单一窗口”尚未推广,国家安全审查的透明度和可预测性尚有不足。成员国应进行双边投资条约修订或谈判,包括在序言中统一可持续性发展表述,推行国际投资“单一窗口”条款,增设程序简化条款;制定《上海合作组织自贸区协定》,为建成上海合作组织自贸区提供法律保障;发挥中国立法的引领作用,修订《外商投资准入特别管理措施(负面清单)》,完善在透明度和可预测性背景下的国家安全审查部门规章。

    Abstract:

    The Declaration on the establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization(SCO) clearly proposed the opening of the negotiation agenda for investment facilitation, and this theme was emphasized in many summit declarations later. The Charter of the SCO promotes the process of investment facilitation from the perspective of organizational law. In addition, memoranda and protocols were signed as soft law. However, at present, the international community has not yet formed a unified definition of investment facilitation. Combined with the regulations of APEC, RCEP and China’s Foreign Investment Law, the definition of investment facilitation of the SCO refers to a series of actions or practices taken by member states to attract foreign investment, maximize its management effectiveness and efficiency at all stages of the investment cycle, and ensure transparency, procedural simplification and predictability, and cover the above measures to meet the integration of the SCO Free Trade Area. In view of the problems of sustainable development caused by the purpose of attracting foreign investment in the member countries of the SCO, the opacity of the negative list has become the most prominent obstacle to the facilitation of the investment access stage. As a measure to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of investment management behavior, the“single window”of international investment has not been promoted, and the transparency and predictability of national security review are still insufficient. The countermeasures refer to flowing methods: firstly, revising or negotiating the bilateral investment treaties of member states. It includes unifying the expression of sustainable development in the preamble, promoting the“single window”clause of international investment, and adding a procedure simplification clause. The second is to formulate the SCO Free Trade Agreement, and provide a basic legal guarantee for the SCO Free Trade Area which is the ultimate goal of SCO economic cooperation. Thirdly, giving play to the leading role of Chinese legislation involves revising the Special Administrative Measures on Access to Foreign Investment (negative list) and improving the regulations of the national security review department under the conditions of transparency and predictability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王淑敏,张乐.上海合作组织投资便利化的法律问题[J].国际商务研究,2023,(1):26-39

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-01-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭