论我国外资国家安全审查的正当程序及其优化进路
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(上海交通大学,上海 200030)

作者简介:

沈伟,上海交通大学法学院特聘教授,博士生导师,英国伦敦政治经济学院法学博士,研究方向:国际法、金融法;陈睿毅,上海交通大学法学院欧盟法研究中心研究助理,研究方向:金融法、国际法。基金项目:国家社科基金重大项目“美国全球单边经济制裁中涉华制裁案例分析与对策研究”(项目编号:21&ZD208)。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D996.4

基金项目:


Optimizing Due Process in the National Security Review System of Foreign Investment in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《外商投资安全审查办法》的出台标志着我国外资国安审查制度日臻成熟,但其制度内容较多停留于操作流程,程序正义尚未能完全体现。外资国安审查属于行政许可,完善权责配置、公开决策程序、敞开沟通途径是我国外资国安审查制度仍需完善的方向。为更好平衡国家安全和投资自由,应通过优化正当程序建构外资国安审查“经纬网”。在程序性规则上形成类案检索、行政公开、听证等程序,运用“利益均衡测试”衡量现有程序正当程度并加以改进;在实质性规则上确立非歧视自由裁量基准、引入监督问责制、加强与外国投资者交涉等制度。

    Abstract:

    The passage of the Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investment marks China’s national security review of foreign investment coming into a more mature stage. However, its system content stresses much in the procedural perspectives. The national security review of foreign investment is a type of administrative licensing. Improving the allocation of power and responsibility, disclosing decision-making procedures and opening up communication channels are the direction of improving the national security review system. In order to better balance national security and investment freedom, the principle of due process should be used to improve the national security review of foreign investment. In terms of procedural rules, three major procedures are formed: case retrieval, administrative openness and hearing. In terms of substantive rules, fairness should be directly taken as the yardstick to measure procedural propriety. Non-discriminatory principle, accountability and negotiation with foreign investors should be installed.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

沈伟,陈睿毅.论我国外资国家安全审查的正当程序及其优化进路[J].国际商务研究,2023,(2):72-84

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭