“一带一路”税收争议仲裁机制的引入与建构研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(南京审计大学,江苏 南京 211815)

作者简介:

赵洲,南京审计大学法学院教授,研究方向:国际法理论与国际税法;吕思彤,南京审计大学法学院硕士研究生,研究方向:国际经济法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D996.3

基金项目:

2018年度国家社科基金重大项目“‘一带一路’建设与中国国际税收法律制度改革创新研究”(项目编号:18ZDA100)。


A Study on the Introduction and Construction of BRI Tax Dispute
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着“一带一路”倡议的深入实施,跨国投资和经营活动面临更多、更复杂的税收争议,现有的税收争议解决机制尤其是相互协商程序机制的局限性日益凸显。中国应在“一带一路”区域构建和运用包容协调的税收争议仲裁机制。“一带一路”税收争议仲裁机制应当作为相互协商程序机制的延伸与补充,具有“应纳税人的请求而启动”的强制性。在内容塑造上,该机制应有充分的包容协调性,以确保税务主管当局在仲裁程序中拥有相应的话语权和影响力。在程序模式上,该机制一般应采用“独立意见”的仲裁程序。在引领构建“一带一路”税收争议仲裁机制的策略和方法上,中国应充分利用“一带一路”沿线国家对税收争议仲裁的态度、实际接受状况及其变化趋势等因素,与相关国家形成符合共同利益需求的多边或双边安排。

    Abstract:

    With the further development of the Belt and Road Initiatives, cross-border investment and business activities are faced with more and complex tax disputes. The existing tax dispute resolution mechanism, especially the mutual agreement procedure mechanism, has increasingly highlighted its limitations and deficiencies. In order to further improve the efficiency and practical effect of BRI cross-border tax dispute resolution, under the background of the gradual introduction and application of tax dispute arbitration mechanism, China should establish and apply an inclusive and coordinated tax dispute arbitration mechanism in the Belt and Road region. The BRI tax dispute arbitration mechanism should be an extension and supplement of the mutual agreement procedure mechanism, and the initiation of which should be mandatory pursuant to the request of taxpayers. As regards the content shaping,such mechanism should be fully inclusive and coordinated, so as to ensure that taxation competent authorities have relevant discourse power and influence in the arbitration process. In terms of arbitration procedure model,such mechanism should generally adopt the arbitral procedure of independent opinion. With respect to tactics and methods of leading the construction of the BRI tax dispute arbitration mechanism, China should make full use of such factors as the attitude and actual acceptance of tax dispute arbitration of BRI countries and its variation tendency, thus form multilateral or bilateral arrangements that meet the pursuit of common interests with relevant countries.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵洲,吕思彤.“一带一路”税收争议仲裁机制的引入与建构研究[J].国际商务研究,2023,(2):85-97

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭