欧盟对中国国企投资的三重监管:特点、影响及因应
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(西南政法大学,重庆 401120)

作者简介:

殷维,西南政法大学国际法学院副教授,研究方向:国际经济法、全球经济治理;方奕欣,西南政法大学中国—东盟法律研究中心研究助理,研究方向:国际经济法。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D996.4

基金项目:

国家社科基金一般项目“国际贸易协定中的国有企业规则与中国方案研究”(项目编号:21BFX152)。


The Triple Regulation of EU on the Investment of Chinese State-owned Enterprises: Characteristics, In.uence and Response
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近年来,欧盟强化对外资的控制与审查,并形成了以《欧盟并购条例》《外资审查条例》和《外国补贴条例》为核心的三重监管框架。然而,该监管框架在规制对象、规制逻辑、审查因素等方面都有对国企的针对性、歧视性之嫌,不仅阻碍了国企投资进入欧盟市场,也挤压了现有国际经贸规则的适用空间并产生负面示范效应。为保障中国发展利益与国企合法权益,应善用国内和国际两种机制,积极采取因应措施。在政府层面:利用 WTO规则和争端解决机制;推动《中欧全面投资协定》生效;构建符合中国利益的国际经贸规则;以竞争中性原则指引国企改革。在企业层面:加强合规审查与风险防范;运用欧盟公共利益进行抗辩;寻求欧盟法下的救济途径。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, the EU has strengthened investment control and review. The EU has formed a triple regulatory framework with the EU Merger Regulation, EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening Regulation and Foreign Subsidy Regulation as the core. The regulatory objects, review factors and regulatory logic in this triple regulatory framework are targeted, restrictive and discriminatory to state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It not only hinders SOEs from investing in the EU market, but also squeezes the space for the application of existing international economic and trade rules and has a negative demonstration effect. Therefore, China should make good use of both domestic and international mechanisms and take effective measures to protect China’s interests in economic development and the legitimate rights and interests of SOEs. At the government level: China should actively use WTO rules and dispute settlement mechanisms; promote the entry into force of the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment; promote the establishment of international economic rules in line with China’s interests; guide the reform of SOEs with the principle of“competitive neutrality”. At the enterprise level: SOEs should strengthen compliance review and risk prevention; take the EU's public interest as a defense; and seek remedies under EU law.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

殷维,方奕欣.欧盟对中国国企投资的三重监管:特点、影响及因应[J].国际商务研究,2025,(6):61-72

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-07
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
郑重声明
关闭