The jurisdiction of international civil and commercial disputes not only refers to direct jurisdiction from foreign trial courts, but also includes indirect jurisdiction by respondent native courts to execute judgments of foreign courts. The actual function of direct jurisdiction is to exercise trial competence on case dispute with jurisdiction base, whereas indirect jurisdiction focuses on whether the execution of jurisdiction is legitimate and rational. The law application for indirect jurisdiction review refers to two aspects, the first one is to confirm the applicable law of indirect jurisdiction, the second one is to decide review criteria of indirect jurisdiction, and the two aspects are mutual relevant. The mode of the law application and confirmation in practice mainly includes application of respondent country law, application of applicant country law, combination of applying both countries, laws, and application of provisions in judicial assistant treaties. The indirect jurisdiction rules in Hague Convention of Judgments (2019) reflect actual connections between courts of direct jurisdiction and disputes or defendants, which are used as the base and criteria of reasonable jurisdiction. This article makes the relevant theoretical and practical analysis on the above background situation and legal issues from aspects of relation and function of law application for indirect jurisdiction review, the mode and principle of law application, the application of review criteria, and the criteria of legal base for indirect jurisdiction review in China.